The Pentagon won't use an Internet voting system for overseas U.S. citizens this fall because of concerns about its security, an official said Thursday.All this is very nice, but the disclosure came just two days before Michigan used the Pentagon's system for their Democratic primary. (See below.)The official, who requested anonymity, said Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz made the decision to scrap the system because Pentagon officials were not certain they could "assure the legitimacy of votes that would be cast."
Computer security experts who last month reviewed the Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment, or SERVE, had urged the Pentagon to scrap the system, saying it was too vulnerable. The experts said the system could be penetrated by hackers who could change votes or gather information about users.
See also:
- Washington Post: Pentagon E-Voting Program Drops out of the Race
- CNET News.com: Pentagon Scraps Net Voting Plan
- Associated Press: Pentagon Cancels Internet Voting System
- New York Times: Online Voting Canceled For Americans Overseas
- BBC News: Pentagon E-Voting Program Scrapped
Thousands of Michigan Democrats have cast ballots for Saturday's caucuses using an Internet system that security experts say shares some of the risks found in a just-scrapped Pentagon effort.I guess they don't get it either. No matter how secure the voting system is made to be, it is the Internet itself that cannot be made secure.Party officials insist they have safeguards and note that these particular ballots, unlike those in the $22 million Pentagon program, are not meant to be secret.
. . .Voting in Michigan began in early January, long before the Pentagon decision, which reflects concerns that the legitimacy of Internet votes cannot be assured. Michigan party officials did not return calls seeking comment on the decision.
See also:
- PCWorld.com: Michigan Democrats Vote Online
Link Loves
- Benedict@Large
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- African Food Blog
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
- iPhone News iPad Review
- Cheap Hotels Travel
- Retirement Planning
- Intelligence Online
- Small Business Victories
- Swap & Hop Sports
- Health Consulting Group
- Genius Duck
- Atlas Travel
- American Electronics and Furniture News
- Elite Kitchens
- Kitchen and Bath Corner
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(173)
-
▼
February
(43)
- NY Times: Making Votes CountThe Results Are in and...
- A Debate on Electronic Voting:A Tool To Improve El...
- No title
- San Francisco Chronicle:Why can't they vote? Disen...
- The Free Press: Speaking Truth to PowerDiebold, El...
- From the Austin Chronicle: How Safe Is Your E-Vote...
- Into the courts: Group wants judge to orderupgrad...
- PBS opens new site for Election 2004 coverageIn th...
- In Maryland: Public Relations CampaignPromotes Di...
- Crumbs to AngelsBeing a fairly obscure blogger can...
- Common Dreams:It's the Electoral System, Stupid!A ...
- VoteWatch2004 Your Eye on the Elections I figured ...
- The Computer Ate My VoteYou've got to love the art...
- A New York Times editorial:Elections With No Meani...
- Tom Paine:Crashing The Vote A rather general exp...
- A few items in response to a reader's querry:I hav...
- Washington Times:[The newspaper the White House re...
- Independent (UK):Voting chaos looms for American e...
- Guardian Unlimited (UK):Hi-tech voting machines 't...
- Associated Press:Report: More E-Voting Systems to ...
- The American Prospect:Numbers GameSince McCain-Fei...
- USA Today Op/Ed:Groups unfairly targeted Steve Ros...
- BBC News: Concerns over US computer voting Two ...
- New York Times:How America Doesn't Vote The Times ...
- What our Supreme hath wrought:Florida bans recount...
- A Common Dreams Editorial:Georgia's "Faith-Based" ...
- Technical DifficultiesOnline voting has led to big...
- Re-posted/Updated:E-Vote problems in New Hampshire...
- Salon:Will the Election Be Hacked?A Salon special ...
- BuzzFlash Interviews:Representative Rush Holton Pa...
- E-Vote Machines Drop More Ballots This one confu...
- The Idaho Statesman:Our View: Fraud-proofing elect...
- Pentagon Gives E-Voting the BootThe Pentagon won't...
- Budgeting for Another FloridaBush Budget Slashes H...
- N.H. Among Few Using Paper in Vote Records The tec...
- As primary season heats upvoting-system upgrades l...
- Electronic voting is solution Obviously, I have so...
- San Jose Mercury News:Electronic voting's hidden p...
- Bob Herbert (NY Times):Vote, and the Pols Will Lis...
- Christian Science Monitor reverses Internet voting...
- A New York Times Editorial:How to Hack an Election...
- More on the Maryland E-Vote hacking test: A pair o...
- E-Vote problems in New Hampshire? Did New Hampshir...
-
▼
February
(43)
0 comments:
Post a Comment